![]() So have you enjoyed our brief introduction to the Old Style types? For those of you who would like to test your knowledge, which of these is generally classified as Old Style: Old Style facesĪnd here are some more Old Style faces: Berling, Calisto, Goudy Old Style, Granjon, Janson, Palatino, Perpetua, Plantin, Sabon and Weiss, to name but a few. Typeface names in red notable figures below. Unlike the relatively short-lived Humanist faces, the Old Style faces held sway for more than two centuries a number of them are still popular text faces today. The Old Style types can be further divided into four categories as in the figure below, and span the roman types from Francesco Griffo to William Caslon I. A Short History of the Printed Word, Chappell and Bringhurst, page 92 Griffo’s contribution to roman type include an improved balance between capitals and lowercase, achieved by cutting the capitals slightly shorter than ascending letters such as b and d, and by slightly reducing the stroke weight of the capitals. The first italic type, then, was conceived as a text face. They were first created, not as an accompaniment to the roman, but as a standalone typeface designed for small format or pocket books, where space demanded a more condensed type. The First Italic TypeĪnd, as we’re on the topic of dramatic changes, during this period we see the very first italic type in 1501. Space doesn’t permit to recount the entire tale here, but for those interested in such details, then head on over to the Typophile e crossbar thread. After searching high and low, and opening just about every type book I own, I decided to post the question on Typophile. I spent quite a time trying to discover why the lowercase e should change so dramatically. You may remember our old friend, the lowercase e of the Humanist (Venetian) types, with its distinctive oblique (sloping) crossbar with Old Style types we witness the quite sudden adoption of a horizontal crossbar (figure 1.3). You can see this, perhaps most notably in the serifs: in Old Style types the serifs on the ascenders are more wedge shaped (figure1.1).Īnother major change can be seen in the stress of the letterforms (figure 1.2) to a more perpendicular (upright) position. As a consequence the Old Style types are characterised by greater contrast between thick and thin strokes, and are generally speaking, sharper in appearance, more refined. The Old Style (or Garalde) types start to demonstrate a greater refinement-to a large extent augmented by the steadily improving skills of punchcutters. It’s certainly one of the most exciting periods in type history. It’s from this period, that we can really see type getting into gear. Old style types, although they owe much to the same roots, show a marked departure from simply mimicking the handwriting of earlier Italian scholars and scribes. Humanist types, we discovered, have strong roots in calligraphy. Today we’re moving along the time line and will spend a little time familiarizing ourselves with some wonderful Old Style typefaces. These early typefaces were reminiscent of handwritten calligraphy.In the first part of this series, we looked at Humanist typefaces we considered them in their historical context, and took a closer look at some of their distinguishing features and modern-day revivals. ![]() ![]() The oldest typefaces were called blackletter, and date back to the 1400s. (This kind of information can generally be found in the commercial descriptions of the various types of fonts.) History of Typeface Styles ![]() Different typefaces are more legible than others at small sizes, while others are more suitable for larger type. Not all serif and sans serif typefaces are equally suitable for both body and headline copy. Monospaced typefaces are generally used for displaying code, though they can also be used for body and headline copy, and were originally used on typewriters. There are five basic classifications of typefaces: serif, sans serif, script, monospaced, and display.Īs a general rule, serif and sans serif typefaces are used for either body copy or headlines (including titles, logos, etc.), while script and display typefaces are only used for headlines. Taking time to learn about typographical elements can help any designer improve their craft and create superior finished projects. Great typography can elevate a design from “good” to “amazing,” while bad typography design (or worse - illegible type) can make even the “best” projects unusable. Possibly with the exception of color, the different types of fonts used in a design have a greater impact on the way a user perceives that design than virtually any other individual design element. Virtually all designers, from brand designers to UI designers to dedicated typography designers, can benefit from expanding their knowledge of typography and typeface classification. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |